40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-24.47%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-24.47% vs PR's -100.00%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.47%
Below half of PR's -100.00%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
9.14%
Receivables growth less than half of PR's 48.55%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
237.21%
Other current assets growth < half of PR's -13.35%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
4.55%
Below half of PR's -52.19%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.36%
Below half PR's 18.93%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.65%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.65%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
25.00%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
-0.06%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.94%
Less than half of PR's 25.25%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.82%
Below half of PR's 18.93%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.14%
Below half of PR's 16.76%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.47%
Less than half of PR's 115.29%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.36%
Less than half of PR's 26.93%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-0.08%
Less than half of PR's 49.77%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.61%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.91%
Less than half of PR's 11.35%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.83%
Less than half of PR's 597.75%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.69%
Less than half of PR's 97.27%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.54%
Below half PR's 2322.37%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-4.95%
Less than half of PR's 282.49%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.95%
Below half PR's 14.84%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
2.14%
Below half PR's 16.76%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
25.00%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
1.30%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.87%
Less than half of PR's 163.78%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
