40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
1255.56%
Cash & equivalents growing 1255.56% while PR's declined -57.00%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1255.56%
Below half of PR's -57.00%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
8.12%
Receivables growth less than half of PR's 26.94%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.73%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
16.46%
Similar yoy growth to PR's 15.32%. Walter Schloss notes comparable short-term expansions. Investigate quality of these assets.
-10.29%
Below half PR's 0.38%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
0.38%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.38%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Both PR and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.17%
Less than half of PR's -7.23%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-7.30%
Below half of PR's 0.34%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.28%
Below half of PR's 0.68%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-1.03%
Less than half of PR's 2.04%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-53.67%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
121.54%
Exceeding 1.5x PR's 14.51%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-2.74%
Less than half of PR's 13.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-9.51%
Above 1.5x PR's -0.89%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.29%
Less than half of PR's 117.45%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-6.80%
Less than half of PR's 1.82%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.45%
Less than half of PR's 3.61%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.19%
0.5-0.75x PR's -5.76%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
2.10%
Less than half of PR's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.84%
≥ 1.5x PR's -0.80%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-5.28%
Below half PR's 0.68%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both PR and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-14.82%
Less than half of PR's 0.31%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-16.35%
Less than half of PR's 0.90%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
