40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
125.00%
Cash & equivalents growing 125.00% while PR's declined -77.37%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
125.00%
Below half of PR's -77.37%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-16.39%
Receivables growth less than half of PR's 68.15%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-88.89%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-16.16%
Below half of PR's 27.41%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.53%
Below half PR's 109.66%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-1.57%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.57%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
975.00%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
154.72%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-15.61%
Above 1.5x PR's -7.31%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
-1.71%
Below half of PR's 110.73%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.68%
Below half of PR's 103.83%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-11.00%
Less than half of PR's 283.88%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
104.65%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-41.67%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1025.00%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
-43.59%
Less than half of PR's 65.64%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-17.09%
Less than half of PR's 94.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-13.81%
Less than half of PR's 187.29%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both PR and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
154.72%
Above 1.5x PR's 60.45%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
-22.15%
1.1-1.25x PR's -19.80%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring extra obligations vs. competitor.
-11.66%
Less than half of PR's 163.58%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.04%
Less than half of PR's 146.25%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.31%
Below half PR's 410.18%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-8.98%
Less than half of PR's 278.95%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.52%
Below half PR's -4.89%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-3.68%
Below half PR's 103.83%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
975.00%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to PR's zero value, indicating better performance.
-7.25%
Less than half of PR's 177.43%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-7.47%
Less than half of PR's 255.35%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
