40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-46.16%
Cash & equivalents declining -46.16% while VET's grows 85.56%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-46.16%
Below half of VET's 85.56%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-47.39%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's -4.27%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-48.53%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 121.60%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-76.94%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-52.12%
Below half of VET's 11.36%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
3.20%
Below half VET's 9.74%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.00%
Less than half of VET's -17.09%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
3.31%
Below half of VET's 9.69%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.82%
Below half of VET's 9.85%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-52.29%
Above 1.5x VET's -14.48%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
19.70%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.15%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's -23.85%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-41.71%
Less than half of VET's 172.90%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-1.29%
Less than half of VET's -100.00%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
1.84%
Less than half of VET's 9.88%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-23.64%
Less than half of VET's 16.89%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.92%
Less than half of VET's -36.40%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.89%
Less than half of VET's 14.49%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
8.85%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.16%
Below half VET's 7.28%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-2.55%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.45%
Below half VET's 5.04%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-8.82%
Below half VET's 9.85%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.19%
Less than half of VET's 42.90%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
34.10%
Similar yoy changes to VET's 39.86%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net leverage strategies.
