40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-50.21%
Cash & equivalents declining -50.21% while VET's grows 26.67%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.21%
Below half of VET's 26.67%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
9.76%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 44.29%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
2.02%
Inventory growth below half of VET's -57.92%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
215499999900.00%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
55.20%
≥ 1.5x VET's 27.39%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
3.65%
1.25-1.5x VET's 2.88%. Bruce Berkowitz notes a significant push to expand capacity faster than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.46%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.46%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-78.92%
Less than half of VET's 345.72%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.68%
Below half of VET's 3.19%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.56%
Below half of VET's 5.59%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
10.88%
50-75% of VET's 17.03%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
208.06%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
651.35%
Less than half of VET's -94.98%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
59.16%
Less than half of VET's -68.36%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-10.25%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.30%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
9.00%
50-75% of VET's 17.35%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
-58.05%
Less than half of VET's 5.47%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-8.21%
Less than half of VET's 139.98%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.28%
Less than half of VET's 5.12%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.30%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
9.72%
1.25-1.5x VET's 8.04%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
8.88%
Less than half of VET's -71.67%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
46889.28%
Above 1.5x VET's 71.67%. Michael Burry suspects a significant bump in 'other' equity items vs. competitor.
4.23%
Similar yoy to VET's 4.47%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
2.56%
Below half VET's 5.59%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.80%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.38%
Less than half of VET's 724.22%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
