40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-17.94%
Cash & equivalents declining -17.94% while VET's grows 16.10%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.94%
Below half of VET's 16.10%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-27.31%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's -10.58%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
59.61%
Inventory growth above 1.5x VET's 36.23%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-100.00%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-21.70%
Below half of VET's 0.18%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.01%
Below half VET's -0.79%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.40%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.40%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.93%
Above 1.5x VET's 7.12%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
4.70%
Below half of VET's -0.78%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
-100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.67%
Below half of VET's -0.68%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-7.22%
Less than half of VET's 35.21%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-66.80%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.49%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's 14.50%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-7.74%
Less than half of VET's 30.97%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
15.58%
Less than half of VET's -4.58%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
3.77%
Less than half of VET's -1.03%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-1.59%
1.1-1.25x VET's -1.34%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is incurring extra obligations vs. competitor.
9.62%
Less than half of VET's -2.99%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
-50.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.69%
Above 1.5x VET's 1.55%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
-100.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.43%
Below half VET's 6.16%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
0.70%
Less than half of VET's -88.80%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
1079.32%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.00%
0.75-0.9x VET's -3.84%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor is growing equity faster.
1.67%
Below half VET's -0.68%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.61%
Less than half of VET's -4.58%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
15.80%
Less than half of VET's -7.98%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
