40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
463.18%
Cash & equivalents growing 463.18% while VET's declined -7.22%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
463.18%
Below half of VET's -7.22%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-8.04%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 38.37%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-26.64%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 106.47%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
486.30%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -94.92%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
18.65%
≥ 1.5x VET's 11.01%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-1.95%
Below half VET's 4.86%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.84%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.84%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.57%
Above 1.5x VET's 7.85%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
3.82%
0.75-0.9x VET's 4.97%. Bill Ackman questions if the competitor invests more robustly in future growth.
-100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.30%
Similar yoy to VET's 5.85%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions. Evaluate the quality of these assets.
-15.31%
Less than half of VET's 20.43%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-65.78%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-23.23%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's -10.88%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-25.03%
Less than half of VET's 5.79%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-3.56%
Less than half of VET's 31.39%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
10.32%
50-75% of VET's 14.51%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
12.90%
Less than half of VET's -7.64%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.32%
Less than half of VET's 13.36%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.80%
Less than half of VET's 10.65%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-1.99%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
33.59%
Below half VET's -65.49%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
44.42%
Less than half of VET's 117.62%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.53%
Below half VET's -3.96%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
5.30%
Similar yoy to VET's 5.85%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.55%
Less than half of VET's 31.39%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-13.49%
Less than half of VET's 176.80%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
