40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-26.78%
Cash & equivalents declining -26.78% while VET's grows 2.78%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.78%
Below half of VET's 2.78%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-18.05%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 38.44%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-59.28%
Inventory growth 50-75% of VET's -90.98%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively tighter stock. Confirm sales aren't sacrificed.
-26.86%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 298.53%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-26.82%
Below half of VET's 15.76%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
3.11%
Below half VET's 16.43%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-100.00%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.40%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.40%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.63%
50-75% of VET's 7.15%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower 'other assets' expansions.
2.83%
Below half of VET's 16.08%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.50%
Below half of VET's 16.03%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
12.07%
Above 1.5x VET's 1.43%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-0.57%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.49%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's 5.58%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
24.18%
Above 1.5x VET's 3.06%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.65%
Less than half of VET's 157.43%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.95%
50-75% of VET's -8.42%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
22.24%
50-75% of VET's 35.25%. Bruce Berkowitz sees fewer new long-term commitments.
-0.94%
Less than half of VET's 45.54%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.43%
Less than half of VET's 31.01%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-1.72%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.22%
1.25-1.5x VET's -5.93%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
-2.43%
Less than half of VET's 0.64%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.15%
Below half VET's 1.61%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.50%
Below half VET's 16.03%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.65%
Less than half of VET's 157.43%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
1.50%
Less than half of VET's 1164.81%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
