40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-6.96%
Cash & equivalents declining -6.96% while VET's grows 100.38%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.96%
Below half of VET's 101.12%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-3.46%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 14.84%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
12.45%
Inventory growth below half of VET's -39.86%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-9.95%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-2.79%
Below half of VET's 35.81%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
6.54%
≥ 1.5x VET's 0.04%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
5.83%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.83%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.61%
Less than half of VET's 30.23%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
5.73%
≥ 1.5x VET's 2.07%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.76%
0.75-0.9x VET's 5.52%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor invests more aggressively for growth.
5.70%
Less than half of VET's 15.93%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
112.88%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-0.94%
Less than half of VET's 11.15%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
14.22%
Similar yoy to VET's 15.24%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-9.96%
Less than half of VET's 9.42%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.27%
Less than half of VET's -6.00%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
1.25%
Less than half of VET's -1.70%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.26%
Less than half of VET's 3.50%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
-100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.13%
Less than half of VET's 5.48%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.36%
0.5-0.75x VET's 7.54%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
37.48%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.08%
≥ 1.5x VET's 5.28%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
4.76%
0.75-0.9x VET's 5.52%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor invests or leverages more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.17%
Less than half of VET's 9.42%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-1.78%
50-75% of VET's -2.80%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
