40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
64.23%
Cash & equivalents growing 64.23% while VET's declined -90.46%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.23%
Below half of VET's -78.91%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-10.85%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -27.46%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
3.08%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 35.60%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
7.81%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -52.66%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
4.96%
Below half of VET's -41.36%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.66%
Below half VET's -1.11%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-2.31%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.31%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
18.57%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1103.42%
Less than half of VET's -51.95%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.14%
Below half of VET's -0.86%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.72%
Below half of VET's -6.27%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
1.39%
Less than half of VET's -22.69%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.68%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
59.43%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-97.41%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-12.02%
50-75% of VET's -18.01%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
-20.84%
1.25-1.5x VET's -14.87%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger leverage expansion vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.21%
Less than half of VET's -9.13%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
157.79%
Less than half of VET's -0.80%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.02%
Less than half of VET's -7.62%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Less than half of VET's -10.33%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.76%
Below half VET's -8.24%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-32.53%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.71%
Below half VET's -2.08%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.72%
Below half VET's -6.27%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
18.57%
Below half VET's 658.08%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-20.40%
1.25-1.5x VET's -14.87%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger debt expansions vs. competitor.
-23.23%
Less than half of VET's 24.09%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
