40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-25.73%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-25.73% vs VET's -40.41%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.73%
Below half of VET's 84.91%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
12.34%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -24.15%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-80.00%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 18.29%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-44.99%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-20.60%
Below half of VET's 8.63%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.93%
Below half VET's 2.69%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-3.06%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
26.60%
Below half of VET's -19.08%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.79%
Less than half of VET's -88.97%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.01%
1.25-1.5x VET's -0.75%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.69%
Below half of VET's 0.23%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-4.71%
Less than half of VET's -10.04%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.08%
Less than half of VET's 23.79%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-10.27%
Similar yoy to VET's -10.67%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-0.67%
Less than half of VET's 11.84%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.10%
Less than half of VET's -7.45%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
1.25%
Less than half of VET's 117.33%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
0.13%
Less than half of VET's -10.75%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.52%
Less than half of VET's -10.73%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.60%
0.75-0.9x VET's -6.65%. Bill Ackman questions if competitor reinvests profits more robustly.
-19.37%
Less than half of VET's -128.63%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.66%
Below half VET's 1.10%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-3.69%
Below half VET's 0.23%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
26.60%
Below half VET's 410.29%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-0.65%
Less than half of VET's 11.84%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
7.95%
Less than half of VET's 30.23%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
