40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-79.81%
Cash & equivalents declining -79.81% while VET's grows 25.27%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.81%
Below half of VET's 22.51%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
11.12%
Receivables growth 50-75% of VET's 15.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
-33.33%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 24.88%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-6.45%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 2.96%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-13.45%
Below half of VET's 16.46%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.03%
Below half VET's -3.56%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
1.74%
Less than half of VET's -100.00%. David Dodd might see less intangible risk, assuming stable revenue growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.74%
Less than half of VET's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
54.89%
Below half of VET's -12.58%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.16%
Less than half of VET's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.99%
Below half of VET's -4.89%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.70%
Below half of VET's -2.05%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
2.71%
Less than half of VET's 15.52%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
174.80%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.23%
Less than half of VET's 350.15%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
32.49%
Similar yoy to VET's 36.34%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-6.79%
Less than half of VET's 24.29%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
247.56%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.54%
50-75% of VET's -2.58%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
-99.77%
Less than half of VET's 0.66%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.82%
Less than half of VET's 7.42%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.89%
Less than half of VET's 15.11%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.71%
Below half VET's -94.50%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-62.23%
Less than half of VET's 66.80%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.38%
Below half VET's -18.96%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.70%
Below half VET's -2.05%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
54.89%
Below half VET's -5.50%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
5.11%
Less than half of VET's 24.29%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
12.74%
50-75% of VET's 23.38%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
