40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
158.33%
Cash & equivalents growing 158.33% while VET's declined -4.93%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.33%
Below half of VET's -5.21%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-5.19%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 5.24%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-50.00%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 22.60%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
98.40%
Above 1.5x VET's 8.96%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
32.41%
≥ 1.5x VET's 3.69%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-3.52%
Below half VET's 5.32%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-5.27%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.27%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
19.11%
Below half of VET's -49.03%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.24%
Below half of VET's 4.71%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.60%
Below half of VET's 4.60%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-0.10%
Less than half of VET's 18.67%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
11.64%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
194.74%
Less than half of VET's -64.12%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
6.28%
Above 1.5x VET's 0.44%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.81%
Less than half of VET's 11.19%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-1.26%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
1.06%
Less than half of VET's -1.72%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.34%
Less than half of VET's 7.98%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.13%
Less than half of VET's 6.11%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.19%
Below half VET's 45.68%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-88.15%
Above 1.5x VET's -46.58%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.42%
Below half VET's 2.79%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.60%
Below half VET's 4.60%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
19.11%
Below half VET's -12.62%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
1.88%
Less than half of VET's 11.19%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-0.36%
Less than half of VET's 15.41%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
