40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-21.69%
Cash & equivalents declining -21.69% while VET's grows 37.37%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.69%
Below half of VET's 37.37%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
0.50%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's -33.54%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.49%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 1754.35%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-19.25%
≥ 1.5x VET's -3.59%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-15.60%
Below half VET's 0.26%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-1.45%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.45%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
141.90%
Less than half of VET's -2.38%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-9.73%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-11.63%
Below half of VET's 0.05%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.56%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.38%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-14.37%
Similar yoy growth to VET's -14.61%. Walter Schloss sees parallel payables strategy. Check top-line correlation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
150.00%
Below half of VET's -60.68%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.35%
Similar yoy changes to VET's -89.41%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
-33.21%
Above 1.5x VET's -19.45%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-0.20%
Less than half of VET's 20.99%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
0.68%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-82.35%
Above 1.5x VET's -2.12%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
200.00%
Above 1.5x VET's 5.18%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-4.29%
Less than half of VET's 9.51%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.25%
Above 1.5x VET's -0.34%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.58%
Below half VET's -300.38%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-1.66%
Less than half of VET's -63.10%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.31%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.43%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-13.56%
≥ 1.5x VET's -0.38%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.20%
Less than half of VET's 20.99%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
9.55%
50-75% of VET's 13.75%. Bruce Berkowitz notes comparatively lower net debt expansion.
