40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
1.32%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of VET's 33.47%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.32%
Below half of VET's 33.47%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-13.44%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 2.20%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-19.51%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 7.39%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
41.06%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 188.07%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
5.41%
Below half of VET's 20.10%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.34%
Below half VET's 0.95%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-2.41%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.41%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
114.55%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.45%
1.25-1.5x VET's -1.15%. Martin Whitman would watch for bigger net operating losses or changes in tax strategy.
0.94%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.18%
Below half of VET's 0.81%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.54%
Below half of VET's 2.97%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-9.49%
Less than half of VET's -27.82%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
200.00%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
100.00%
1.25-1.5x VET's 73.20%. Martin Whitman sees heavier short-term tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-74.69%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-82.59%
Similar yoy changes to VET's -87.78%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
23.33%
Less than half of VET's -16.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-14.33%
Less than half of VET's 9.50%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.42%
Above 1.5x VET's -0.07%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-10.24%
Less than half of VET's 4.91%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.81%
Less than half of VET's 0.08%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.73%
Less than half of VET's 5.53%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
34.64%
Similar yoy to VET's 33.18%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
-2.75%
Less than half of VET's 56.18%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
-1.73%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
12.89%
≥ 1.5x VET's 6.50%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
0.54%
Below half VET's 2.97%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
114.55%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-0.22%
Less than half of VET's 9.50%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-0.91%
Less than half of VET's 1.61%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
