40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-15.74%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-15.74% vs VET's -61.15%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-100.00%
Similar yoy growth to VET's -100.00%. Walter Schloss would note comparable strategies in building short-term reserves.
-15.74%
Below half of VET's -61.15%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-19.48%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 19.08%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-24.60%
Inventory growth 1.25-1.5x VET's -17.63%. Martin Whitman worries about slower turnover or potential markdown risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.36%
Below half of VET's -34.18%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.05%
Below half VET's 13.16%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-2.68%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.68%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-39.08%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-12.03%
Above 1.5x VET's -1.64%. Michael Burry suspects major tax losses or deferrals building up, raising concerns about sustained profitability.
13.38%
Higher Other Non-Current Assets Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.34%
Below half of VET's 12.28%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.58%
Below half of VET's 4.92%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
606.79%
Above 1.5x VET's 5.67%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
-76.80%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-65.52%
Below half of VET's 74.68%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-99.25%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-62.14%
Less than half of VET's 58.35%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-15.31%
Less than half of VET's 17.74%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.46%
Less than half of VET's -4.64%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.04%
Less than half of VET's 7.85%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-0.95%
Less than half of VET's 0.34%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.34%
Less than half of VET's 3.37%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.57%
Less than half of VET's 1.21%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
3.20%
Below half VET's 149.29%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
3.51%
Less than half of VET's 96.59%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.69%
Below half VET's 6.72%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.58%
Below half VET's 4.92%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-39.08%
Below half VET's -100.00%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-10.24%
Above 1.5x VET's -4.64%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-8.16%
Less than half of VET's 32.03%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
