40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
500.59%
Cash & equivalents growing 500.59% while VET's declined -26.75%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
-100.00%
Both VET and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
500.59%
Below half of VET's -26.75%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-48.24%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's -1.42%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
68.33%
Inventory growth below half of VET's 177.16%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-10.20%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 25.66%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
41.98%
Below half of VET's -2.53%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-15.84%
Below half VET's 2.22%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-2.30%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.30%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-95.29%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
17.91%
Less than half of VET's -0.18%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
56.25%
Less than half of VET's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-13.72%
Below half of VET's 2.10%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.25%
Below half of VET's 1.74%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
349.75%
Less than half of VET's -4.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.67%
Below half of VET's -70.48%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
-94.37%
Both VET and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-86.69%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's -38.61%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
37.74%
Similar yoy to VET's 50.27%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
-19.28%
Above 1.5x VET's -5.61%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
-12.65%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-41.50%
Above 1.5x VET's -5.67%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
-25.46%
Less than half of VET's 0.39%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-20.15%
Above 1.5x VET's -1.99%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.83%
Less than half of VET's 6.10%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
29.20%
Above 1.5x VET's 1.12%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
-33.91%
Below half VET's -191.41%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
69.52%
Less than half of VET's -701.40%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.73%
0.5-0.75x VET's -3.36%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
-7.25%
Below half VET's 1.74%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-95.29%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-3.85%
Less than half of VET's 14.66%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-22.75%
Less than half of VET's 19.12%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
