40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
8.88%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of VET's 193.11%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.88%
Below half of VET's 193.11%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-33.40%
Receivables growth above 1.5x VET's -9.25%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.67%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's -78.47%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
10.96%
≥ 1.5x VET's 4.96%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
1.69%
Below half VET's 4.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-0.57%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.57%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2500.00%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-6.49%
Less than half of VET's 2.95%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-52.77%
50-75% of VET's -71.01%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower 'other assets' expansions.
-0.89%
Below half of VET's 4.35%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
Below half of VET's 4.39%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-77.81%
Less than half of VET's 3.30%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.44%
Below half of VET's 8.20%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
364.29%
Exceeding 1.5x VET's 54.51%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
21.75%
1.1-1.25x VET's 18.00%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.39%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
19.23%
Less than half of VET's -15.40%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
2.82%
Less than half of VET's 21.88%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-1.37%
Less than half of VET's 9.80%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.18%
Less than half of VET's 10.69%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-20.28%
Less than half of VET's 1.87%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-32.67%
≥ 1.5x VET's -8.65%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
3.51%
Less than half of VET's -63.78%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.70%
Below half VET's -4.27%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.52%
Below half VET's 4.39%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
2500.00%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.09%
Less than half of VET's 3.58%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-1.25%
Less than half of VET's 0.49%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
