40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-22.40%
Cash & equivalents declining -22.40% while VET's grows 102.62%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.40%
Below half of VET's 102.62%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
4.25%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 38.61%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.01%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of VET's -42.87%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
-4.82%
Below half of VET's 36.46%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
2.20%
Below half VET's 32.92%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-0.58%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.58%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-36.21%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-0.59%
Less than half of VET's 148.59%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
26.62%
Less than half of VET's -67.85%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.85%
Below half of VET's 35.69%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.12%
Below half of VET's 35.73%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
31.72%
1.25-1.5x VET's 23.50%. Martin Whitman sees potential reliance on supplier financing. Verify liquidity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.33%
Below half of VET's -35.27%. David Dodd notes smaller yoy tax burden vs. competitor. Check consistent profit levels.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.48%
Less than half of VET's 41.43%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
50.56%
Above 1.5x VET's 30.18%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-11.91%
Less than half of VET's 17.75%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
3.86%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-3.03%
50-75% of VET's -4.11%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower DTL growth.
-12.39%
Less than half of VET's 49.78%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-8.35%
Less than half of VET's 13.27%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.56%
Less than half of VET's 15.76%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.54%
Less than half of VET's 49.22%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
-62.43%
≥ 1.5x VET's -12.64%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-2.35%
Less than half of VET's -21.21%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.12%
Below half VET's 69.12%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
0.12%
Below half VET's 35.73%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-36.21%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-0.88%
Less than half of VET's 18.89%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
0.86%
Less than half of VET's 17.70%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
