40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
72.03%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x VET's 11.73%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.03%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x VET's 11.73%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-35.11%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 5.14%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
467.81%
Other current assets growth < half of VET's 1848.41%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
41.89%
1.25-1.5x VET's 32.39%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
-5.88%
Below half VET's 5.33%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-1.35%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.35%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-83.33%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-18.06%
1.1-1.25x VET's -14.87%. Bill Ackman wonders if the company booked more losses or deferrals than competitor.
78.75%
Less than half of VET's 165.28%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-5.69%
Below half of VET's 4.41%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.17%
Below half of VET's 5.95%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-86.69%
Less than half of VET's 22.46%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
117300.00%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating better performance.
-12.67%
Less than half of VET's -53.18%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-25.39%
Above 1.5x VET's -10.59%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.36%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
-18.18%
Less than half of VET's 26.68%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-3.65%
Less than half of VET's 6.76%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-3.94%
Less than half of VET's 4.61%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.51%
Less than half of VET's 1.78%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-22.57%
Less than half of VET's 0.18%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
174.87%
≥ 1.5x VET's 13.58%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-6.03%
Less than half of VET's 76.80%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.68%
1.25-1.5x VET's 11.54%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
0.17%
Below half VET's 5.95%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-83.33%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-0.12%
Less than half of VET's 3.52%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-8.81%
Less than half of VET's 3.41%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
