40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-17.37%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-17.37% vs VET's -70.83%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.37%
Below half of VET's -70.83%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-4.75%
Receivables growth less than half of VET's 25.04%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.97%
Other current assets growth 50-75% of VET's 10.52%. Bruce Berkowitz notes fewer expansions. Possibly simpler working capital.
-4.36%
Below half of VET's 9.14%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.01%
Below half VET's -2.14%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-0.23%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to VET's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-54.37%
Both VET and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
1.17%
Less than half of VET's -2.47%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-7.40%
Less than half of VET's 505.35%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.55%
0.75-0.9x VET's -1.83%. Bill Ackman questions if the competitor invests more robustly in future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.80%
1.25-1.5x VET's -1.25%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
-5.55%
Less than half of VET's 60.95%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.46%
Similar yoy changes to VET's -23.33%. Walter Schloss finds parallel near-term liability trends.
-6.75%
Less than half of VET's 5.09%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-0.40%
Less than half of VET's 3.24%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
-9.67%
Both VET and the company show zero Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth.
44.44%
Less than half of VET's -3.83%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-17.23%
Above 1.5x VET's -4.22%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-1.42%
Less than half of VET's 0.41%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.53%
Less than half of VET's 0.93%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-2.46%
Less than half of VET's 0.26%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
38.23%
Below half VET's -7.49%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-0.59%
Less than half of VET's -23.77%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.94%
Below half VET's -4.06%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.80%
1.25-1.5x VET's -1.25%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
-54.37%
Both VET and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-1.05%
Less than half of VET's 2.78%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-0.71%
Less than half of VET's 4.10%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
