PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Reveals whether the business's core operations generate sufficient cash to cover expenses, fund growth, and return capital to shareholders. Sustainable free cash flow is often a key indicator of long-term value creation.
1.83
OCF/share above 1.5x VET's 1.17. David Dodd would verify if a competitive edge drives superior cash generation.
-0.60
Negative FCF/share while VET stands at 0.24. Joel Greenblatt would demand structural changes or cost cuts.
132.49%
Capex/OCF above 1.5x VET's 79.36%. Michael Burry would suspect an unsustainable capital structure.
1.21
Positive ratio while VET is negative. John Neff would note a major advantage in real cash generation.
41.46%
50–75% of VET's 56.97%. Martin Whitman would question if there's a fundamental weakness in collection or margin.