PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
150.15%
Net income growth similar to BTE's 157.55%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
5.84%
Some D&A expansion while BTE is negative at -7.02%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
11.63%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BTE's 37.32%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.40%
Slight usage while BTE is negative at -389.20%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.40%
Some yoy usage while BTE is negative at -389.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
160.04%
Some yoy increase while BTE is negative at -3699.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
107.95%
Some CFO growth while BTE is negative at -34.28%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-10.91%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -211.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
208.20%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BTE's 439.23%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
94.82%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BTE's 252.39%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.38%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BTE's 188.74%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.