40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-66.50%
Negative net income growth while BTE stands at 103.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.85%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BTE at -1.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
89.98%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BTE's 379.09%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
Slight usage while BTE is negative at -31329.06%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.53%
Some yoy usage while BTE is negative at -31329.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
65.57%
Some yoy increase while BTE is negative at -102.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
36.66%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BTE's 22.78%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-11.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -240.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-127.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while BTE is 11.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-447.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -218.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-70.02%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
2.34%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BTE's 898.10%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
50.69%
Buyback growth of 50.69% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.