40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
621.54%
Net income growth above 1.5x BTE's 3.82%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
9.06%
D&A growth well above BTE's 1.98%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
2081.16%
Well above BTE's 97.88% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.92%
Less working capital growth vs. BTE's 441.40%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.92%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. BTE's 441.40%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
521.17%
Some yoy increase while BTE is negative at -163.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
185.43%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x BTE's 9.93%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-43.06%
Negative yoy CapEx while BTE is 73.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
275.76%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BTE's 2003.68%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
40.72%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. BTE's 121.87%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
-42.65%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-71.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -172.14%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
99.51%
Buyback growth of 99.51% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.