40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
190.44%
Net income growth above 1.5x BTE's 30.55%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.38%
D&A growth well above BTE's 2.86%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
141.65%
Some yoy growth while BTE is negative at -73.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-342.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BTE at -50.81%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-342.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BTE at -50.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
4415.47%
Some yoy increase while BTE is negative at -3231.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
13.29%
Some CFO growth while BTE is negative at -11.45%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
20.43%
Lower CapEx growth vs. BTE's 43.42%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-57.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -8122.25%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
12.58%
We have mild expansions while BTE is negative at -560.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
90.67%
Debt repayment growth of 90.67% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.06%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. BTE's 6097.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
35.04%
Buyback growth of 35.04% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.