40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-34.85%
Negative net income growth while BTE stands at 18.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
10.84%
D&A growth well above BTE's 21.12%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
28.68%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BTE's 65.55%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.11%
Slight usage while BTE is negative at -678.55%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.11%
Some yoy usage while BTE is negative at -678.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-66.94%
Negative yoy while BTE is 14.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
2.36%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of BTE's 39.42%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-39.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -70.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.36%
Growth well above BTE's 103.04%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-37.33%
We reduce yoy invests while BTE stands at 86.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-834.30%
We cut debt repayment yoy while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-92.96%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -99.61%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
68.61%
Buyback growth of 68.61% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.