PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
269.37%
Net income growth similar to BTE's 256.61%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-0.25%
Negative yoy D&A while BTE is 25.30%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-267.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BTE stands at 264.21%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-146.15%
Negative yoy SBC while BTE is 9.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.33%
Well above BTE's 46.99% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.33%
Growth well above BTE's 46.99%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-10.00%
Negative yoy while BTE is 26.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
63.91%
Operating cash flow growth similar to BTE's 68.43%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
10.63%
Some CapEx rise while BTE is negative at -5.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
262.79%
Acquisition growth of 262.79% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-103.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
317.65%
Liquidation growth of 317.65% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
5.77%
We have some outflow growth while BTE is negative at -85.65%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.04%
We have mild expansions while BTE is negative at -150.13%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
50.00%
We repay more while BTE is negative at -76.41%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.