PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
142.24%
Some net income increase while BTE is negative at -23.08%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-4.31%
Negative yoy D&A while BTE is 15.29%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
2466.67%
Some yoy growth while BTE is negative at -3.18%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-13.64%
Negative yoy SBC while BTE is 4.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
183.80%
Well above BTE's 53.63% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.80%
Growth well above BTE's 53.63%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-12.28%
Negative yoy while BTE is 11.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.66%
Negative yoy CFO while BTE is 25.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.59%
Negative yoy CapEx while BTE is 6.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-2816.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-112.13%
Negative yoy purchasing while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1373.68%
Liquidation growth of 1373.68% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-52.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -77.66%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-233.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -1340.78%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
68.51%
We repay more while BTE is negative at -215.73%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.