40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.68%
Net income growth under 50% of BTE's 84.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-15.45%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with BTE at -49.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
6.23%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. BTE's 70.46%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
366.67%
SBC growth well above BTE's 22.64%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
1933.33%
Slight usage while BTE is negative at -149.44%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1933.33%
Some yoy usage while BTE is negative at -153.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-38.95%
Both negative yoy, with BTE at -46.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-38.17%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BTE at -20.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-0.95%
Negative yoy CapEx while BTE is 28.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-83.29%
Negative yoy acquisition while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-116.44%
Negative yoy purchasing while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
442.34%
Liquidation growth of 442.34% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
0.99%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BTE's 80.52%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-354.10%
We reduce yoy invests while BTE stands at 47.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1508.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -5507.92%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.