PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
50.49%
Net income growth above 1.5x BTE's 20.26%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-21.59%
Negative yoy D&A while BTE is 0.79%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
35.94%
Some yoy growth while BTE is negative at -125.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
80.00%
SBC growth while BTE is negative at -53.20%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-42.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BTE at -122.49%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BTE at -161.16%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
256.67%
Some yoy increase while BTE is negative at -13.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-1.10%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BTE at -96.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
40.80%
Some CapEx rise while BTE is negative at -10.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
668.69%
Acquisition growth of 668.69% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-10.59%
Negative yoy purchasing while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.80%
We reduce yoy sales while BTE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
40.59%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. BTE's 1854.54%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
153.68%
Investing outflow well above BTE's 8.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-4166.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -1242.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.