PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-55.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with BTE at -80.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.44%
Less D&A growth vs. BTE's 28.93%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-72.15%
Negative yoy deferred tax while BTE stands at 169.58%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
105.88%
SBC growth while BTE is negative at -31.99%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-172.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BTE at -206.29%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
207.02%
AR growth of 207.02% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-172.73%
Both reduce yoy usage, with BTE at -206.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
29.17%
Well above BTE's 29.22%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-16.56%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with BTE at -21.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
24.53%
Some CapEx rise while BTE is negative at -27.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
1073.33%
Acquisition growth of 1073.33% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-373.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while BTE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-373.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with BTE at -2502.96%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
29.31%
We have mild expansions while BTE is negative at -37.46%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
91.75%
We repay more while BTE is negative at -44.59%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.56%
Buyback growth of 66.56% while BTE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.