PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.69%
Negative net income growth while CNQ stands at 7.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.13%
Less D&A growth vs. CNQ's 5.79%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
275.64%
Well above CNQ's 310.60% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-328.54%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CNQ is 91.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-328.54%
Negative yoy usage while CNQ is 91.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
224.19%
Some yoy increase while CNQ is negative at -798.41%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-28.82%
Negative yoy CFO while CNQ is 4.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
21.91%
Some CapEx rise while CNQ is negative at -6.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Liquidation growth of 100.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-85.51%
We reduce yoy other investing while CNQ is 72.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-458.90%
We reduce yoy invests while CNQ stands at 10.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-294.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-20.41%
Negative yoy issuance while CNQ is 17.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
17.81%
Buyback growth of 17.81% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.