40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.54%
Negative net income growth while CNQ stands at 306.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.22%
Some D&A expansion while CNQ is negative at -80.99%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-27.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CNQ stands at 143.35%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
393.72%
Well above CNQ's 152.73% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.98%
Growth of 14.98% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-38.83%
Both negative yoy, with CNQ at -38.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
37.95%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x CNQ's 24.60%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-24.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -25.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24525.00%
Acquisition growth of 24525.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
385.71%
Purchases growth of 385.71% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
24.36%
Liquidation growth of 24.36% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-284.94%
We reduce yoy other investing while CNQ is 72.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-194.64%
We reduce yoy invests while CNQ stands at 13.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-89.47%
Negative yoy issuance while CNQ is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.