PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2316.00%
Some net income increase while CNQ is negative at -30.85%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-24.50%
Negative yoy D&A while CNQ is 648.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-345.92%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.05%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CNQ at -410.34%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
4147.62%
Some yoy increase while CNQ is negative at -33.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-48.46%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with CNQ at -3.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
38.21%
Some CapEx rise while CNQ is negative at -15.65%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-84.85%
Negative yoy acquisition while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
157.62%
We have some outflow growth while CNQ is negative at -9.20%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
155.57%
We have mild expansions while CNQ is negative at -14.81%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
52.77%
Debt repayment above 1.5x CNQ's 10.15%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-50.00%
Negative yoy issuance while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.