40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
93.57%
Some net income increase while CNQ is negative at -2.22%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.55%
Negative yoy D&A while CNQ is 32.77%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
53.71%
Some yoy growth while CNQ is negative at -337.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-209.09%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CNQ at -183.67%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-100.41%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CNQ is 53.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.41%
Negative yoy usage while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1740.00%
Some yoy increase while CNQ is negative at -3133.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-37.22%
Negative yoy CFO while CNQ is 6.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-0.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -14.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
4380.65%
Acquisition growth of 4380.65% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
151.67%
Purchases growth of 151.67% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
0.13%
Liquidation growth of 0.13% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-0.39%
We reduce yoy other investing while CNQ is 190.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
167.36%
We have mild expansions while CNQ is negative at -10.32%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -78.42%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.