40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
146.22%
Net income growth above 1.5x CNQ's 50.61%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.73%
Some D&A expansion while CNQ is negative at -12.92%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-55.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CNQ stands at 263.54%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
100.00%
SBC growth well above CNQ's 120.00%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
22.40%
Slight usage while CNQ is negative at -230.91%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.40%
Some yoy usage while CNQ is negative at -230.91%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
72.73%
Well above CNQ's 90.60%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
104.11%
Some CFO growth while CNQ is negative at -37.99%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
28.73%
CapEx growth well above CNQ's 16.10%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-66.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-28.73%
Negative yoy purchasing while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-41.54%
We reduce yoy sales while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
26.70%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CNQ's 92.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
19.78%
Investing outflow well above CNQ's 19.69%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-57.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -744.23%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.