PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
142.24%
Net income growth above 1.5x CNQ's 72.03%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-4.31%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CNQ at -3.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
2466.67%
Well above CNQ's 20.38% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-13.64%
Negative yoy SBC while CNQ is 32.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
183.80%
Well above CNQ's 83.72% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.80%
Growth well above CNQ's 83.72%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-12.28%
Negative yoy while CNQ is 45.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.66%
Negative yoy CFO while CNQ is 81.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-9.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -166.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-2816.67%
Negative yoy acquisition while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-112.13%
Negative yoy purchasing while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
1373.68%
Liquidation growth of 1373.68% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-52.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -13300.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-233.86%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -228.11%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
68.51%
We repay more while CNQ is negative at -665.60%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.