PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
59.63%
Net income growth at 50-75% of CNQ's 83.58%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
-1.23%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CNQ at -14.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
71.43%
Some yoy growth while CNQ is negative at -127.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CNQ at -205.91%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-283.33%
AR is negative yoy while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.76%
Both reduce yoy usage, with CNQ at -205.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
181.25%
Some yoy increase while CNQ is negative at -2433.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
45.84%
Some CFO growth while CNQ is negative at -38.65%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.28%
Some CapEx rise while CNQ is negative at -0.70%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-47.37%
Negative yoy acquisition while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while CNQ stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
64.67%
Growth well above CNQ's 33.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-82.45%
We reduce yoy invests while CNQ stands at 2.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
69.83%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x CNQ's 57.79%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.