40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.60%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CNQ at -19.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.83%
Less D&A growth vs. CNQ's 6.68%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
51.72%
Well above CNQ's 48.09% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
206.67%
SBC growth well above CNQ's 91.11%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-76.69%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CNQ is 114.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
303.27%
AR growth of 303.27% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-220.33%
Negative yoy AP while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-26.19%
Negative yoy usage while CNQ is 114.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2933.33%
Negative yoy while CNQ is 31.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-28.42%
Negative yoy CFO while CNQ is 3.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7200.00%
Acquisition growth of 7200.00% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
750.00%
We have some outflow growth while CNQ is negative at -90.91%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
48.64%
Investing outflow well above CNQ's 16.06%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
52.31%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of CNQ's 76.90%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.74%
We cut yoy buybacks while CNQ is 13.37%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.