PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-63.52%
Negative net income growth while CNQ stands at 18.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
30.00%
Some D&A expansion while CNQ is negative at -51.74%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
128.44%
Well above CNQ's 105.09% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-129.41%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CNQ at -79.31%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4540.00%
Slight usage while CNQ is negative at -469.05%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
694.58%
AR growth of 694.58% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-862.36%
Negative yoy inventory while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-232.88%
Negative yoy AP while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
4540.00%
Some yoy usage while CNQ is negative at -469.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
92.42%
Well above CNQ's 42.61%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
22.06%
Some CFO growth while CNQ is negative at -71.50%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-70.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -0.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
26.38%
Acquisition growth of 26.38% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-414.29%
We reduce yoy other investing while CNQ is 300.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-46.02%
We reduce yoy invests while CNQ stands at 8.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-7000.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while CNQ is 94.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.13%
We cut yoy buybacks while CNQ is 8.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.