40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.59%
Net income growth under 50% of CNQ's 73.76%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.28%
Less D&A growth vs. CNQ's 7.12%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.62%
Well above CNQ's 5.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-43.48%
Both cut yoy SBC, with CNQ at -104.42%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
99.39%
Less working capital growth vs. CNQ's 3533.33%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-63.37%
AR is negative yoy while CNQ is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.65%
AP growth of 97.65% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
77.17%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. CNQ's 3533.33%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-102.14%
Negative yoy while CNQ is 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
52.98%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x CNQ's 42.40%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-3.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with CNQ at -45.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
99.02%
Acquisition growth of 99.02% while CNQ is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-365.49%
We reduce yoy other investing while CNQ is 111.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
17.07%
Investing outflow well above CNQ's 27.08%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
75.38%
We repay more while CNQ is negative at -1175.95%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.40%
We have some buyback growth while CNQ is negative at -25.74%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.