PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
269.37%
Net income growth above 1.5x CRK's 12.18%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-0.25%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with CRK at -6.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-267.27%
Negative yoy deferred tax while CRK stands at 2.06%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-146.15%
Negative yoy SBC while CRK is 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.33%
Slight usage while CRK is negative at -254.65%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.33%
Some yoy usage while CRK is negative at -4380.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-10.00%
Both negative yoy, with CRK at -146.24%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
63.91%
Some CFO growth while CRK is negative at -89.05%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
10.63%
Some CapEx rise while CRK is negative at -14.04%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
262.79%
Acquisition growth of 262.79% while CRK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-103.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while CRK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
317.65%
We have some liquidation growth while CRK is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
5.77%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. CRK's 1563.67%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
20.04%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. CRK's 793.38%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
50.00%
We repay more while CRK is negative at -1948.90%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.