PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-962.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with CRK at -34.72%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.33%
Some D&A expansion while CRK is negative at -45.48%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-813.33%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
94.64%
SBC growth while CRK is negative at -33.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
95.74%
Less working capital growth vs. CRK's 387.33%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth while CRK is negative at -32.91%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.74%
Growth well above CRK's 121.36%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
214.46%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. CRK's 3877.62%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
84.67%
Some CFO growth while CRK is negative at -15.48%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
14.12%
Some CapEx rise while CRK is negative at -6.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
113.94%
Acquisition growth of 113.94% while CRK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.12%
Negative yoy purchasing while CRK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-40.95%
We reduce yoy sales while CRK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
13.68%
We have some outflow growth while CRK is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
104.06%
We have mild expansions while CRK is negative at -6.50%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
94.52%
We repay more while CRK is negative at -315.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.