40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
59.63%
Net income growth under 50% of CRK's 164.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.23%
Negative yoy D&A while CRK is 89.06%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
71.43%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. CRK's 180.10%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.76%
Negative yoy working capital usage while CRK is 1.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-283.33%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with CRK at -1082.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.76%
Negative yoy usage while CRK is 82.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
181.25%
Some yoy increase while CRK is negative at -980.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
45.84%
Operating cash flow growth similar to CRK's 49.96%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
2.28%
Some CapEx rise while CRK is negative at -79.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-47.37%
Negative yoy acquisition while CRK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-100.00%
Negative yoy purchasing while CRK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy sales while CRK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
64.67%
We have some outflow growth while CRK is negative at -732.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-82.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with CRK at -81.63%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
69.83%
We repay more while CRK is negative at -60366.67%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.