40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-52.47%
Negative net income growth while EQT stands at 127.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.52%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 3.22%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-35.39%
Negative yoy deferred tax while EQT stands at 416.01%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.54%
Slight usage while EQT is negative at -179.32%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.54%
Some yoy usage while EQT is negative at -201.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-104.47%
Both negative yoy, with EQT at -2017.38%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
2.05%
Some CFO growth while EQT is negative at -54.89%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
16.35%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -50.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.21%
Growth of 152.21% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
50.84%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -50.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-62.65%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-0.41%
Negative yoy issuance while EQT is 2359.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-38.03%
We cut yoy buybacks while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.