40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
190.44%
Net income growth above 1.5x EQT's 89.59%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
6.38%
D&A growth well above EQT's 0.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
141.65%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. EQT's 5343.50%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-342.49%
Both reduce yoy usage, with EQT at -86.43%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-342.49%
Negative yoy usage while EQT is 153.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
4415.47%
Well above EQT's 63.23%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
13.29%
Some CFO growth while EQT is negative at -61.11%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
20.43%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -73.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with EQT at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-57.59%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
12.58%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. EQT's 59.18%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
90.67%
Debt repayment growth of 90.67% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
1.06%
We slightly raise equity while EQT is negative at -27.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
35.04%
Buyback growth of 35.04% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.