40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-134.19%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with EQT at -65.93%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
1.75%
D&A growth well above EQT's 1.42%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-82.16%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.45%
Well above EQT's 25.37% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.34%
Some yoy usage while EQT is negative at -48.88%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-1545.00%
Both negative yoy, with EQT at -95.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
215.67%
Some CFO growth while EQT is negative at -26.96%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-16.70%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -40.37%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
42.47%
Some acquisitions while EQT is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
23.58%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. EQT's 100.00%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
16.70%
Below 50% of EQT's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-11.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-3.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -39.88%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to EQT's 100.00%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-75.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -98.20%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
44.06%
Buyback growth of 44.06% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.