40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.82%
Negative net income growth while EQT stands at 103.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.87%
Some D&A expansion while EQT is negative at -255.63%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
176.39%
Well above EQT's 160.04% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Well above EQT's 75.31% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.16%
Growth well above EQT's 38.04%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-843.75%
Both negative yoy, with EQT at -89.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
38.84%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x EQT's 6.67%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-5.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with EQT at -23.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
103.70%
Acquisition growth of 103.70% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-266.67%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
5.63%
We have some liquidation growth while EQT is negative at -100.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-2.44%
We reduce yoy other investing while EQT is 42.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-4.25%
We reduce yoy invests while EQT stands at 117.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-40.24%
We cut debt repayment yoy while EQT is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.