PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Ovintiv Inc. (OVV)
40.910.33 (-0.80%)
40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
269.37%
Some net income increase while EQT is negative at -13.88%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.25%
Negative yoy D&A while EQT is 13.05%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-267.27%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-146.15%
Negative yoy SBC while EQT is 65.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
62.33%
Slight usage while EQT is negative at -2276.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.33%
Growth well above EQT's 70.36%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-10.00%
Negative yoy while EQT is 981.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
63.91%
Some CFO growth while EQT is negative at -0.54%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
10.63%
Some CapEx rise while EQT is negative at -64.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
262.79%
Acquisition growth of 262.79% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-103.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while EQT stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
317.65%
Liquidation growth of 317.65% while EQT is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
5.77%
We have some outflow growth while EQT is negative at -70.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
20.04%
We have mild expansions while EQT is negative at -64.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
50.00%
We repay more while EQT is negative at -547.29%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.